← Wed, Sep 23 digest

28% of job postings on company career sites have been open over 90 days

read article ↗ hn thread ↗

summary

A large portion of open job listings remain active on employer websites long after they are typically filled, suggesting a systemic issue with 'ghost jobs'. Approximately 28.3% of postings have been open for over 90 days, with a significant number exceeding 180 days. This data indicates that many job seekers may be applying to roles that are no longer being actively recruited for. The research highlights a discrepancy between job board availability and actual hiring activity.

key points

  1. Job posting longevity varies significantly by industry and platform, with hospitality roles remaining open the longest and Workday listings closing the fastest.
  2. A small percentage of closed positions are reposted within 30 days, indicating that most removals are genuine closures rather than cyclical reposting strategies.
  3. Salary transparency remains inconsistent globally, with high disclosure rates in the United States and low rates in countries like India and Sweden.

who should read it

Job seekers looking to optimize their application strategy by identifying stale listings and recruiters interested in understanding industry-wide hiring patterns.

discussion skeptical

consensus

Commenters generally agree that the modern job application process is dysfunctional, characterized by 'screaming into the void' and disrespectful applicant tracking systems. While some argue that large companies maintain evergreen listings to manage constant attrition, most users find this practice frustrating and opaque. There is a strong demand for mandatory salary transparency and a reduction in redundant data entry during applications.

top insight

The analogy of hard drive failure at scale illustrates how large companies treat hiring as a statistical necessity rather than a series of individual events. Just as a server farm continuously replaces failing drives, a massive corporation continuously hires to offset a predictable rate of natural attrition. This shifts the perspective of a job listing from a specific vacancy to a systemic maintenance requirement.

Generated by an LLM from the article and thread. Check the sources before relying on it.