Copyright does more harm than good and should be abolished
summary
The Mastodon web application requires JavaScript to function correctly for users accessing it via a browser. If JavaScript is disabled, the site cannot load its interactive elements or content. Users who prefer not to use JavaScript or cannot enable it are encouraged to use native applications instead. This ensures a consistent and accessible experience across different platforms.
key points
- The web version of Mastodon is built as a single-page application that relies heavily on JavaScript for rendering. Without it, the interface cannot be the displayed correctly.
- Native apps provide an alternative access method that does not rely on the browser's JavaScript engine. These apps are typically optimized for specific mobile or mobile devices.
who should read it
Individuals attempting to access Mastodon via a web browser who encounter a JavaScript warning. It helps them understand why the site is not loading and provides alternative options for }
discussion skeptical
consensus
Commenters generally agree that current copyright terms, particularly the 70-year post-mortem extension, are excessive and serve corporate interests rather than creators. There is a strong sentiment that copyright should be significantly shortened to a term like 20-30 years to better align with the actual revenue window of most works. Many argue that these extensions create a 'copyright cliff' where mid-century works disappear from public view until they finally enter the public domain.
top insight
The discussion reveals that shortening copyright duration may not solve all systemic issues, as the 'scope' of copyright is equally problematic. Specifically, the ability of companies to control access to already purchased digital copies or restrict reproduction for personal use creates harms that a shorter time limit alone would not address.
Generated by an LLM from the article and thread. Check the sources before relying on it.